Better to Threaten Than to be Nice

Tuesday, October 12, 2010


Interestingly enough, a study, done by the University of Arizona, shows that threatening government agencies works better than taking the nice and friendly approach.

This study sent different government agencies letters to request public records. Some agencies were sent a friendly and polite letter, others were sent neutral letters and the rest were sent a "legalistic letter that threatened litigation for noncompliance."

Of the friendly and neutral letters sent out, half responded. Surprisingly two thirds of the agencies who received the threatening letter responded back, and more quickly to top it off.

To most the friendly letter would seem to get more responses. "Treat other how you want to be treated", right? Guess not.

To have a better chance at getting the information and in a timely manner sending a threatening letter is your best option.

The
Student Press Law Center offers assistance to journalism students looking to obtain public records from stubborn government agencies.

Many still say to first use the friendly and polite approach because it can result in a more pleasant response. Then if this doesn't get journalists what they want they should send them a
threatening letter.

1 comments:

Sheyenne Manning October 13, 2010 at 12:50 PM  

This is very interesting. I wonder how it would look if journalists used this approach, though. A lot of journalists can be described as "driven," but that doesn't necessarily mean they were threatening. I'd like to know more about if this is a technique being taught or if it is just street smarts that is picked up through experience.

Post a Comment

  © Blogger template On The Road by Ourblogtemplates.com 2009

Back to TOP